We are commissioning our first list. If you are working on an edition, a translation or a monograph within our scope, we would like to see it.
We are a new press. We have no backlist and no established reputation, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. What we can offer is serious attention to a proposal, genuine external review, no charges of any kind, and a publisher whose subject is the same as yours.
Send the following to press@tamalanreasrc.org. There is no form to complete.
| Stage | Typical time |
|---|---|
| Acknowledgement | 3 working days |
| Editorial assessment | 3 weeks |
| External review, at least two readers | 8–10 weeks |
| Decision | within 4 months of proposal |
Proposals that fall outside our scope are declined quickly and with reasons, so that you can go elsewhere without waiting.
Proposals within scope are sent to at least two external readers with relevant expertise. We ask them to assess the scholarship, the necessity of the book, and its suitability for our list. Reader reports are sent to you in full, whatever the outcome.
The full manuscript is reviewed again on delivery. Acceptance of a proposal is a commitment to consider the finished book seriously, not a guarantee of publication.
For a critical edition or translation we will also want to know:
On manuscripts in private hands: we expect editions of privately held material to be prepared with the knowledge and consent of the custodian, and for the custodian to receive a copy of the published volume. We will ask about this.
We follow the same standards as our journal. Work must be original and not under consideration elsewhere; sources must be properly credited; permissions for reproduced material must be secured before production; and research involving communities must document consent and address benefit-sharing. Any use of generative AI in preparing a manuscript must be disclosed, and AI cannot be credited as an author.
If you are unsure whether a project fits, send a paragraph describing it to press@tamalanreasrc.org. We would rather answer that than have you spend a week on a proposal we cannot use.